Cases 1 - 10 of 24
(PC) Mcelroy v. Gates et al
as 1:2021cv00053
Defendant:
C. Williams, T. Kubicki, B. Gricewich and others
Plaintiff:
Ej Mcelroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosas v. Davey et al
as 1:2014cv00611
Plaintiff:
Federico Rosas
Defendant:
D. Davey, C. Sandoval, D. Goss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Atcherley v. Hanna, et al
as 2:2013cv00576
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Atcherley
Defendant:
J. Hanna, A. Rivas, N. Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darryl Aggers v. Tyson, et al
as 11-17138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL KEITH AGGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
TYSON, Kern Valley State Prison, Captain, MADELLIN, Correctional Counselor and B. GRICEWICH
Alvaro Quezada v. B Gricewich, et al
as 11-16782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVARO QUEZADA
Defendant - Appellee:
B GRICEWICH, N. GRANNIS and TAKAHASHI, Correctional Officer
Claudell Martin v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 11-15830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAUDELL EARL MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director of Department of Corrections, N. GRANNIS, Chief Appeal Officer, MCGUINESS, MD and others
Alvaro Quezada v. Hedgpeth et al
as 1:2009cv02040
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Quezada
Defendant:
A. Hedgpeth, K. Harrington and B. Gricewich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Claudell Martin v. Jeanne Woodford, et al
as 09-16934
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAUDELL EARL MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNE S. WOODFORD, Director of Department of Corrections, N. GRANNIS, Chief Appeal Officer, MCGUINESS, MD and others
Jorge Diaz v. K. Prunty, et al
as 09-16352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JORGE ARMANDO DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee:
K. W. PRUNTY, Undersecretary, N. GRANNIS, Chief of Inmate Appeals, B. GRICEWICH, Appeals Coordinator and others
Gary Perkins v. C. Pfeiffer, et al
as 09-15120
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY RONNELL PERKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. PFEIFFER, B. GRICEWICH and A. HEDGPETH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
