McClellan v. Kern County Sheriff's Office et al
| Gregory McClellan |
| W. Smallwood, John Marshall, T. Gonzales, M. Cutillo, S. Roberson, W. Hakker, Kern County Sheriff's Office and Donny Youngblood |
| 1:2010cv00386 |
| March 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 164
ORDER denying 162 Motion for Reconsideration of order denying extension of time to pay filing fee signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/16/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 160
ORDER DISMISSING Action for Plaintiff's Failure to Pay Filing Fee; Clerk to Terminate Motions and CLOSE CASE signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/4/2017. CASE CLOSED. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 156
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Pay Filing Fee within Fourteen Days signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 09/09/2017. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 141
ORDER DENYING 128 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP and ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to Pay the $400.00 Filing Fee Within Fourteen (14) Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/15/2016. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 125
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 112 Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Interrogatories on Defendants signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 09/28/2015. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 124
ORDER ADOPTING In Part and Declining to Adopt in Part 97 Findings and Recommendations and Granting 83 Motion to Revoke IFP Status signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 09/28/2015. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 122
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 101 Motion for Sanctions, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/31/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 117
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS To Deny Plaintiff's Motion To Amend The Pleadings (ECF No. 88 & 100 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/13/2015. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing 106
ORDER GRANTING In Part and DENYING In Part Defendants' 89 Motion to Compel, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/27/2015. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 100
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny Plaintiff's 88 Motion to Amend the Pleadings signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 07/13/2015. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 7/31/2015.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 97
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending to Deny Defendants' 83 Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's IFP Status signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 07/10/2015. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 7/27/2015.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 80
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 77 Request to Extend Discovery Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/20/15. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing 55
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/11/2014 recommending to: (1) GRANT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RULING 51 ; (2) DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR COURT CERTIFICATION 41 ; (3) DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STAY COURT PROCEEDINGS 54 AND DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 53 . Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 12/29/2014.(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 52
ORDER Denying 49 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/07/2014. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 39
ORDER Denying Motion For Ruling (ECF No. 36 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/25/2014. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing 37
ORDER Denying 28 Motion for Reconsideration of Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations; ORDER Denying as Moot 30 Request that Clerk File Objections to Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 08/06/2014. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations for Service of Cognizable Claim in Fourth Amended Complaint against Defendants Lozano, Wood, and Perkins, and Dismissing All Other Defendants, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/24/14. Service is appropriate for Louis Wood, S. Lozano, Kenneth Perkins. 30-Day Deadline. (Attachments: # 1 USM Forms, # 2 Fourth Amended Complaint)(Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing 23
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Finding that Plaintiff States a Cognizable Fourth Amendment Claim and Dismissing other Claims and Defendants for Failure to State a Claim re 21 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 06/02/14. Objections Due Within Fourteen Days. Referred to Judge O'Neill. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER Vacating 14 Findings and Recommendations and ORDERING Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/17/14. Amended Complaint Due Within Thirty Days. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint Form)(Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing 14
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Finding that Plaintiff States a Cognizable Fourth Amendment Claim and Dismissing other claims and Defendants for Failure to State a Claim; Objections Due within Fourteen Days signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/27/2013. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 10/17/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER Dismissing Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint 11 , With Leave to Amend, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/20/12. Third Amended Complaint Due Within Thirty Days. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint Form)(Gonzalez, R)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
