Rogers v. Yates et al
| Roy Ephraim Rogers |
| James Yates and Guerra |
| 1:2010cv02038 |
| November 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Exhaust 20 , 29 ; ORDER DISMISSING Case, Without Prejudice; ORDER for Clerk to Close Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/11/13. (CASE CLOSED) (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER STRIKING 32 Surreply, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/5/2012. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
30
AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - NOTICE and Warning of Requirements for Opposing Defendant Repp's Motion to Dismiss 29 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/16/12. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
24
AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER-NOTICE and WARNING of Requirements for Opposing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 8/23/2012. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DENYING 14 Motion for Substitution of Parties signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 5/10/2012. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Transferring Claims Against Defendants R. Nipper, Dr. Levis, M. Fordham, and L. Parker to Central District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/9/11. (Verduzco, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
