Yearwood v. Biter et al
| Ricardo Yearwood |
| G. Moonga, S. Zamora, Riesha Arnet, M.D. Biter, James A. Yates, Kushner, J. Todd and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
| 1:2011cv00132 |
| January 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER denying 19 Objections motion for reconsideration signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/10/2012. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/4/2012 DISMISSING CASE (Strike). CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Docs. 11 , 13 , 14 and ORDER DENYING 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 12/20/2011. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why this Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Obey a Court Order and Failure to State a Claim; Response Due within Eighteen Days signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/28/2011. Show Cause Response due by 10/19/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis of Pay Filing Fee Within 45 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 1/28/2011. (Motion for IFP due by 3/18/2011) (Attachments: # 1 IFP Application)(Marrujo, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
