Cases 1 - 10 of 112
Lujan v. Swaney et al
as 2:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Lujan
Defendant:
Warden Swaney, Lt. J. Todd, C.O. Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MORADO v. TODD et al
as 3:2023cv24715
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LESTER MORADO
Defendant:
J TODD, J GARRETT, J BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Megan Stepansky v. Jimmy Lane
as 23-2162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MEGAN STEPANSKY
Defendant / Appellee:
JIMMY LANE, DAVID BOONE, SHARON BALLARD and others
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 7:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stepansky v. Lane et al
as 3:2023cv00537
Plaintiff:
Megan Stepansky
Defendant:
Jimmy Lane, David Boone, Sharon Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. Georgia Cryoservices, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03443
Plaintiff:
Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Defendant:
Georgia Cryoservices, Inc., Xytex Corporation, Xytex Cryo International LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Todd v. Dilda et al
as 1:2023at00514
Plaintiff:
Steven J Todd
Defendant:
Nicholaus D. Dilda, City of Ridgecrest and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Todd v. Dilda et al
as 1:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Todd
Defendant:
Nicholaus D. Dilda and City of Ridgecrest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dinkle v. Conley et al
as 2:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Joshua Dinkle
Defendant:
J. Conley, Mrs. Barnes, S. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis, Jr. v. Carmarillo, et al
as 2:2023cv00049
Defendant:
Corey Davis, Jr., J. Carmarillo, P. Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
