Elliott v. Nuebarth, et al.
| William Elliott |
| Neybarth, Woo, Director, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, C.D.C.R., Warden, Corcoran State Prison and Chief C.M.O. |
| 1:2011cv00294 |
| February 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to effect service of process and failure to obey a court order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/21/2013. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why this Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to Provide Sufficient Information to Effectuate Service on Defendants; Thirty Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/20/2013. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/13/2012 dismissing certain claims re 17 First Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by William Elliott. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, With Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim; ORDER That Dismissal is Subject to 28 U.S.C. 1915(G), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/21/2012. CASE CLOSED (Strike). (Marrujo, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
