Rowan Brooks v. James Yates
Petitioner: Rowan Brooks
Respondent: James Yates
Case Number: 1:2011cv01315
Filed: August 9, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 77 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Deny Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/24/17. Objections to F&R Due Within Twenty One Days. (Marrujo, C)
March 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER GRANTING Extension of Time to File Traverse signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/9/2017. 30-day deadline. (Jessen, A)
November 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER Adopting 57 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER GRANTING Equitable Tolling and FINDING Federal Petition Timely Filed; ORDER REFERRING Matter back to Magistrate Judge for further Proceedings signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/9/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
September 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 57 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Petitioner be granted equitable tolling up to the time he filed the instant federal habeas petition, the petition be considered timely filed, and Respondent be directed to file an answer ; referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 09/30/2016. Objections to F&R due (21-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
August 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER Directing Parties to File Briefs and Setting Briefing Schedule signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 08/11/2016. (Flores, E)
August 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER Vacating October 5, 2012 Order Denying Motion for Relief from Judgment; ORDER on Remand Granting Petitioner's Motion for Relief from Judgment Dated June 13, 2012; ORDER Vacating Judgment Entered on November 22, 2011; ORDER Remanding Case to Magistrate Judge for Further Proceedings signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 08/09/2016. (Flores, E)
May 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 48 AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING Parties to File Briefs and Setting Briefing Schedule, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/13/16. (Marrujo, C)
May 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER Directing Parties to File Briefs and Setting Briefing Schedule signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 05/12/2016. (Flores, E)
March 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER GRANTING Motion to Remove Counsel of Record 36 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/30/16: Petitioner is substituted in the place of Gregory H. Mitts and is proceeding pro se. (Hellings, J)
May 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER GRANTING 33 Motion to Proceed IFP on Appeal and Directing Clerk to Serve the Court of Appeals, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 05/07/2013.(Electronic copy of this order sent to USCA) (Martin-Gill, S)
November 29, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Declining to Issue Certificate of Appealability, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/29/12. (Gonzalez, R)
October 5, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Denying Petitioner's Motion For Relief From Judgment (Doc. 12 ), ORDER Denying As Moot Motion For Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. 13 ), ORDER Denying As Moot Motion For Release During Appeal (Doc. 14 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/5/2012. (Fahrney, E)
September 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Disregarding Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis As Moot (Doc. 15 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/6/2012. (Fahrney, E)
June 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REQUIRING Counsel of Record to File Response; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Serve Order on Counsel of Record and Petitioner, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/21/12. (Hellings, J)
October 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending to Dismiss 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; ORDER Directing Objections to be Filed within Twenty Days; ORDER Directing Clerk of The Court to Assign District Judge to Case signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/19/2011. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 11/14/2011. (Flores, E)
August 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why the Petition Should Not be Dismissed For Violation of the One-Year Statute of Limitations; ORDER DIRECTING That a Response by Filed Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/12/2011. Show Cause Response due by 9/19/2011. (Marrujo, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rowan Brooks v. James Yates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rowan Brooks
Represented By: Gregory Henrick Mitts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Yates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?