Grandison v. M. Stainer et al
Jeffery Sebastian Grandison |
M. Stainer, E. Stelter and Pierce |
1:2011cv01506 |
September 7, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kern |
Anthony W. Ishii |
Michael J. Seng |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER Denying Motion For Reporter's Transcripts At Government Expense (ECF No. 33 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/23/2012. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 25 ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS For Dismissal Of Action With Prejudice For Failure To State A Claim (ECF No. 23 ), Clerk To Close Case, Dismissal As Strike Under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/9/2012. CASE CLOSED.(Strike)(Fahrney, E) |
Filing 23 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to stare a claim re 21 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Jeffery Sebastian Grandison ; referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 9/4/2012, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 07/30/2012. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 19 ORDER To SHOW CAUSE Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed For Failure To Comply With Court Order And Failure To State A Claim (ECF No. 17 ), Fourteen (14) Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/3/2012. Show Cause Response due by 7/19/2012.(Fahrney, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.