Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Pierce v. L H C Group Inc
as 6:2026cv03587
Plaintiff:
Cindy Pierce
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
City of White Plains v. REV Group LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01486
Plaintiff:
City of White Plains
Defendant:
REV Group LLC, E-ONE Inc, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv06036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Toledo v. REV Group LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01546
Plaintiff:
City of Toledo
Defendant:
REV Group LLC, E-ONE Inc, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Scott v.Pierce et al
as 3:2026cv00919
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Adriane Scott
Defendant:
Reentry Counselor Pierce, Reentry Counselor Williams, Chap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
City of Chula Vista v. REV Group LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01543
Plaintiff:
City of Chula Vista
Defendant:
REV Group LLC, E-ONE Inc, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Nicholas Purpura
as 26-3260
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS E. PURPURA
Respondent:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, & CO., JAMES DIMON, DEAN COOPER and others
Macon Bibb County v. REV Group LLC et al
as 1:2026cv01536
Plaintiff:
Macon Bibb County
Defendant:
REV Group LLC, E-ONE Inc, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
City of Oceanside v. Rev Group LLC et al
as 2:2026cv01485
Plaintiff:
City of Oceanside
Defendant:
REV Group LLC, E-ONE Inc, Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
