Cases 1 - 10 of 9,503
Pierce v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 1:2025cv00433
Plaintiff:
Alexis Pierce
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Corcoran, D.O. v. HCA, Inc. et al
as 8:2025cv00105
Defendant:
Far West Division, Inc., Healthtrust Workforce Solutions, LLC, HCA, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Corcoran, D.O.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Mwithiga v. Pierce, et al.
as 25-240
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CLARK, LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN MCMAHILL, Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
PETER MWITHIGA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00070
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Trujillo v. Hughes et al
as 3:2025cv00041
Defendant:
K Reichert, Debbie Knauer, Connie Dolce and others
Plaintiff:
Moises B Trujillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Martuscello et al
as 6:2025cv06024
Defendant:
Jeremy Pierce, Joseph Bishop, Thomas Delmar and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Shahid Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. The Power of Pure, LLC
as 3:2025cv00320
Plaintiff:
Kelsea Pierce
Defendant:
The Power of Pure, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Matthews et al v. Guest Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv00002
Plaintiff:
Edward Jordan, Jefferson Broughton, Tracy Bowser and others
Defendant:
Gerard T. Gabrys and Guest Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv00041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
