Zelig v. Igbinosa, M.D. et al
| Harry Zelig |
| CDCR, Felix Igbinosa, M.D., James Yates and Clark Kelso |
| 1:2011cv01515 |
| September 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending DISMISSAL Of Action With Prejudice For Failure To Obey A Court Order And Failure To State A Claim (ECF No. 16 ), Objections, If Any, Due Within Fourteen Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/14/2012. F&R's referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 10/1/2012. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE 14 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/9/12: Response Due Within Fourteen Days. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/7/2011 granting 8 Motion for Extension of time to file objections to findings and recommendations. Objections to F&R due by 11/10/2011.(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
7
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/21/2011 recommending that 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Harry Zelig be DENIED. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
