Coley v. Brazelton et al
| Andrew Calvin Coley |
| P. D. Brazelton, F. Martinez, De La Cruz, W. Tucker, M. Santo Ya, Dotson, J. Morgan and Redding |
| 1:2013cv00912 |
| June 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Solano |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION for Failure to State a Cognizable Claim; ORDER that this Action Count as a Strike Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 09/01/2016. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Adopting 25 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 9 11 19 23 Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/11/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
25
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 9 , 11 , 19 , 23 Plaintiff's Motions for Preliminary Injunctive Relief be DENIED re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/8/2014. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:13-cv-1129 DAD) to Fresno (1:13-cv-0912 GSA) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/14/13.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
