Cases 1 - 10 of 1,584
De La Cruz v. Ocean Harvesters et al
as 1:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Carlos De La Cruz
Defendant:
Ocean Harvesters, Omega Protein, Inc. and Fictitious Defendants A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
De La Cruz v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02117
Plaintiff:
Maria De La Cruz
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00745
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
P.C. et al v. County of Sonoma et al
as 3:2024cv02597
Plaintiff:
P.C. and M.C.
Defendant:
County of Sonoma, Estate of Jacqueline Johnson, Monisha Sashital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. De La Cruz
as 24-1434
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
ANDY SAMUEL DE LA CRUZ-SOCORRO
KUKU v. BOHLER et al
as 2:2024cv05694
Plaintiff:
ADEKUNLE KUKU
Defendant:
AUDREY BOHLER, CHIAKA OFUA, KARTRA CHARLEMAGNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ v. RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv05635
Petitioner:
EFRAIN VALADEZ DE LA CRUZ
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guzman Barrera v. De La Cruz et al
as 5:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Guzman Barrera
Defendant:
Sebastien De La Cruz and Juan De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
