Turpitt v. Riverbank Housing Authority et al
| Sharon Turpitt |
| Riverbank Housing Authority, U.S. Postal Service and Daryl A Trujillo |
| 1:2014cv00602 |
| April 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanislaus |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/15/2015 ORDERING that this action and cross-action are DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/8/2015 ORDERING that, pursuant to Rule 35 of the FRCP, plaintiff will submit to an independent medical examination by a medical professional selected by the United States and/or the Housing Authority of the City of Riverbank at a place and time that is agreed to by the parties. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/10/2015 ORDERING that pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, all of plaintiff's claims against the United States Postal Service and Does 1-100 are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear her or its own costs. The United States of America remains as the sole defendant on the complaint. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Administratively Update Docket signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/26/2015. U.S. Postal Service (as cross-defendant) and Daryl A. Trujillo (as defendant and cross-defendant) terminated. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DISCHARGING OSC. The Court's October 14, 2014, Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED; By no later than November 14, 2014, Plaintiff and Defendant Riverbank Housing Authority shall file executed summonses demonstrating service on Defe ndants and Cross-Defendants U.S. Postal Service and Trujillo or a statement indicating whether they intend to pursue claims against these Defendants/Cross-Defendants; a Case Management Conference is hereby SET for December 2, 2014, at 9:45 a.m.; the parties shall coordinate one conference call to the Court at (559) 499- 5790 at the time and date for the CMC; the scheduling conference currently set for November 5, 2014, is CONTINUED to January 6, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7; A Joint Scheduling Report shall be filed on or before December 30, 2014; andtelephonic appearances for the Scheduling Conference on January 6, 2015, are GRANTED, and all parties wishing to appear telephonically shall coordinate one call to the Court at (559) 499-5790 at the date and time for the conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/24/2014. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE and ORDER that PLAINTIFF SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 10/23/2014, is CONTINUED to 11/5/2014, at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Mag istrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. By no later than 10/23/2014, Plaintiff shall file a statement showing cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failing to comply with the Court's 7/23/2014, minute order, and for failing to participate in the preparation of a joint scheduling report as set forth in the Court's 4/24/2014, order setting a mandatory scheduling conference. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/14/2014. (Timken, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
