Cases 1 - 10 of 539
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2136
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GAINES v. T-MOBILE et al
as 1:2024cv01552
Defendant:
ANDY MOHR CAR DEALERSHIP, IN ADMINISTRATIVE DEPT., HUNNIGTON BANK and others
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS B. GAINES
Cross-Defendant:
1,000 MILES AWAY DIGITAL SCIENTORS WITH THE DIGITAL MANIPULATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamilton v. DeJoy
as 24-50597
Plaintiff:
Chelsea A. Hamilton
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service
Evans v. Goral et al
as 3:2024cv50240
Defendant:
Winnebago Sheriff Department, Susan Goral, Rockford Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00604
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TELLO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2024cv05725
Plaintiff:
Lenny Tello and Rosa Pazmino
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA d/b/a U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA doing business as U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Service
as 6:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409 Postal Service
DUBOSE et al v. U.S ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2024cv01542
Plaintiff:
ABDUSH DUBOSE, ZUMAR DUBOSE and KARIEM DUBOSE
Defendant:
U.S ATTORNEY GENERAL, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC, U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cofield v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Defendant:
PNC Bank, U.S. Postal Service, N.Y. E.B.T. and others
Plaintiff:
Rickey Cofield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
