Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Tambi v. U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General
as 8:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Deatrice Tambi
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General and Maryland Department of Human Services
Weinberger et al v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 1:2021cv01760
Plaintiff:
Sharon Weinberger and The James Madison Project
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Weinberger et al v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 8:2021cv01760
Plaintiff:
SHARON WEINBERGER and THE JAMES MADISON PROJECT
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Haughie v. U.S. et al
as 8:2021cv00101
Defendant:
W. Hill, Security Guard Patterson, B. Swan-Mace and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Haughie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Prasad v. Brennan et al
as 1:2018cv03946
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service and Megan J. Brennan
Plaintiff:
Rajendra M. Prasad
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Street v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2018cv01036
Plaintiff:
Rondell Street
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Street v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2017cv01277
Plaintiff:
Rondell Street
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Pack v. U.S. Postal Service
as 1:2013cv03187
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence Pack
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
WASHINGTON v. DONAHOE et al
as 8:2013cv00339
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE WASHINGTON
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe, PRINCE JONES, NIGEL MCCLEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
