The Sherwin-Williams Company, d/b/a Sherwin-Williams Automotive Finishes v. COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC.
| The Sherwin-Williams Company, d/b/a Sherwin-Williams Automotive Finishes |
| COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC. |
| 1:2015at00624 |
| July 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Sherwin-Williams Company, d/b/a Sherwin-Williams Automotive Finishes v. COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Sherwin-Williams Company, d/b/a Sherwin-Williams Automotive Finishes | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Scott Mason |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
