Cases 1 - 5 of 5
The Sherwin-Williams Company v. Courtesy Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc., et al.
as 1:2015cv01137
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Defendant:
Courtesy Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc. and Ben Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Sherwin-Williams Company, d/b/a Sherwin-Williams Automotive Finishes v. COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC.
as 1:2015at00624
Plaintiff:
The Sherwin-Williams Company, d/b/a Sherwin-Williams Automotive Finishes
Defendant:
COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep,, et al v. James Goldstene, et al
as 08-17380
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL VALLEY CHRYSLER-JEEP, INC., MADERA FORD MERCURY, INC., MADERA CHEVROLET and others
Plaintiff-intervenor - Appellant:
THE ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTUERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his official capacity as Excecutive Officer of the California Air Resources Board
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE and others
Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep,, et al v. James Goldstene, et al
as 08-17378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CENTRAL VALLEY CHRYSLER-JEEP, INC., MADERA FORD MERCURY, INC., MADERA CHEVROLET and others
Plaintiff-intervenor:
THE ASSOCIATION OF INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTUERS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES N. GOLDSTENE, in his official capacity as Excecutive Officer of the California Air Resources Board
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE and others
Amicus Curiae:
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW) and INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY
Mansu et al v. Kennedy et al
as 2:2008at00983
Plaintiff:
Leo Mansu, Lisa Fideldy, Jerry Harper and others
Defendant:
William J Kennedy, THE EAR OF MALCHUS, a Washington corporation, THE LOST SHEEP, a Washington corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
