Alaniz, et al. v. Schwarzenegger, et al.
| Andrew Alaniz, Alfred Allen, Andrew Cejas, Daniel Devine, Clinton Everett, Sokha Hinn, Lawrence Massey, Antonio Montano, Richard Neff, Amos Roberts, Natividad Rodriguez, Jesus Romero, Manual Tejeda, Jeffrey Tyson, Vance Utley, Christopher Deon William and Pasqual Aparicio |
| Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard, Paul Brazelton, Matthew Cate, Scott Frauenheim, James Hartley, Susan Hubbard, Deborah Hysen, Felix Igbinosa, Scott Kernan, Chris Meyer, Tanya Rothchild, Teresa Schwartz, James Tilton, Dwight Winslow, Carl Wofford, James Yates, Robert Sillen and Clark Kelso |
| 1:2015cv01063 |
| July 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED. Matter referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days of service of this recommendation, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/30/2019. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER re Stipulation to Continue Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/20/19. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER RE STIPULATION: It is hereby ordered that the Alaniz complaint will be treated as operative as to Defendant Winslow under the same governing orders as the Courts August 22, 2016 order (ECF No. 40 in Case No. 1:15-cv-00452), with all other issues being reserved. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/18/2016. (Valdez, E)(Valdez, E)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER VACATING August 24, 2016 Hearing and GRANTING Plaintiff's Request to Proceed in Alaniz 26 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/19/16. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO LIFT STAY TO AUGUST 24, 2016. Motion Hearing previously set for July 20, 2016 is continued to 8/24/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/5/2016. (Valdez, E)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER STAYING ACTION Pursuant to the Stipulation of the Parties signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/18/2016. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER re Plaintiffs' Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendants J. Clark Kelso and Robert Sillen re 21 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/1/16. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER ON STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING AND VACATING FEBRUARY 2, 2016 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. The time for defendants to file a responsive pleading in this matter is extended to March 1, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/11/2016. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Requiring Plaintiffs to Either File an Executed Notice of Service of Summons or Serve the Complaint within 20 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/4/2015. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Continuing Scheduling Conference currently set for 11/2/2015 to 2/2/2016 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/19/2015. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER re 10 , 11 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendants, Clark Kelso and Robert Sillen signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/13/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
