Gilbert v. Igbinosa et al
| Joseph Gilbert |
| Felix Igbinosa, James Yates, Matthew Cate, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Susan L. Hubbard, Tanya Rothchild, Deborah Hysen, J. Clark Kelso, Dwight Winslow, William F. Alvarez and John G. Diep |
| 1:2015cv01352 |
| September 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL ORDER 9 AND JUDGMENT 10 TO CONSIDER OBJECTIONS 11 ; ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL 8 ; DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION AS MOOT 7 ; DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AS BARRED BY DOCTRINE OF CLAIM PRECLUSION AND DIRECTING CLERKS OFFICE TO ENTER JUDGMENT signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/9/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
8
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Action be Dismissed, with Prejudice, pursuant to Doctrine of Claim Preclusion, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 10/14/15. Referred to Judge O'Neill; 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed as Barred by Doctrine of Res Judicata signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/10/2015. Show Cause Response due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
