Green v. Sherman, et al.
Cedric Eugene Green |
Stuart Sherman, J. Perez, Ramos, J. Zamora, Ms. Franklin, Cunning, Ybarra and J. Jasso |
1:2015cv01548 |
October 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Dennis L. Beck |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 ORDER that Inmate Cedric Eugene Green, CDCR #F-38011 is no Longer Needed as a Participant in these Proceedings, and the Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum is DISCHARGED signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/23/2018. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 61 ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Transport Plaintiff Cedric Eugene Green, CDCR# F-38011 for Settlement Conference on March 23, 2018 at 9:00 a.m., at Corcoran State Prison signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 02/22/2018. (Flores, E) |
Filing 58 ORDER GRANTING 49 Motion for Clarification ; ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 54 Motion to Declare Exhaustion of Remedies; ORDER STRIKING 53 Reply to Defendant Franklin's answer to the complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/31/18. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 57 ORDER Setting Settlement Conference on March 23, 2018, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/23/2018. (Settlement Conference set for 3/23/2018 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone at CSP-Corcoran) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 47 ORDER ADOPTING 42 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONSfor Action to Proceed on First Amendment Claim Against Defendant Franklin and to Dismiss all other claims and defendants; Defendant Franklin shall respond to the second amended complaint within twenty-one days of the date of this order, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/7/17. (21-Day Deadline) Ramos terminated. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 45 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 36 Motion Objecting to Any Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/30/17. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 42 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff proceed on his First Amendment Claim for Money Damages against Defendant Franklin in her individual capacity; All other claims asserted inthe second amended complaint and all other named defend ants be dismissed with prejudice re 40 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint filed by Cedric Eugene Green ; referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/25/2017. Objections to F&R due by 11/13/2017 (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 35 ORDER (1) DENYING 29 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss as Moot; (2) Directing Clerk of Court to File Plaintiff's Lodged First Amended Complaint Nunc Pro Tunc; (3) GRANTING 33 Defendants' Request to Screen the First Amended Complaint; and (4) DISMISSING First Amended Complaint WITH LEAVE TO AMEND signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/1/2017. Second Amended Complaint due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 32 ORDER DENYING 30 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/24/2017. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 22 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 19 Motion for Clarification signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/23/2017. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 17 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS (1) For Service of Cognizable Claims Against Defendants Franklin and Ramos; And (2) To Dismiss All Other Claims and Defendants With Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/23/16. Objections to F&R Due Within Fourteen Days. (Marrujo, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.