Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,393
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00511
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05444
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
G v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2024cv04295
Defendant: Nicholas Ramos, United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), Jeffrey Wilson and others
Plaintiff: V G
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez et al v. CMG Solutions Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv61257
Defendant: CMG Solutions Inc. and Eric Nicholsberg
Plaintiff: Devanee Amber Doodnauth, Christopher Ramos, Andres Felipe Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia-Pineda, et al. v. Garland
as 24-4393
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner: GERADIN RAMOS-GARCIA and ESTHER NOHEMI GARCIA-PINEDA
M. v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv04267
Defendant: Ryan Kershaw, Estate of Nicholas T. Ramos and United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff: L. M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
N. v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2024cv04273
Plaintiff: L. N.
Defendant: estate of nicholas theodore ramos and United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ramos Uribe v. Garland
as 24-4360
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner: LUIS RAMOS URIBE
In re: Ramos
as 24-802
Unknown: In re: JACQUE MARIE RAMOS
(PC) Plunkett v. Vaughn et al
as 2:2024cv01936
Defendant: Bhupinder Lehil, Callen, W. Vaughn and others
Plaintiff: Charles Plunkett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?