Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Ramos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ramos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00860
Plaintiff:
Michael Ramos
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Ramos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Mike Ramos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HealthCare Facility Managment LLC v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
HealthCare Facility Managment LLC and HealthCare Facility Managment LLC doing business as CommuniCare Family of Companies
Counter Claimant:
Jeddalyn Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00520
Plaintiff:
Jessica Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration and Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Ramos v. Central Ohio Cleaning, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Edwin Ramos
Defendant:
Central Ohio Cleaning Inc. and Nick Schrock
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ramos v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Doreen Ramos
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04334
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ramos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramos v. Garza
as 4:2022cv01873
Petitioner:
Julio A Ramos
Respondent:
Warden Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos v. C.R.Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02281
Plaintiff:
Genaro Ramos
Defendant:
C.R.Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
