Ratcliff v. Akanno, et al.
| William Ratcliff |
| J. Akanno, M. Spaeth, OGun Omolade, A. Rangel and A. Manasrah |
| 1:2016cv00584 |
| April 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Defendants Manasrah, Ogun, Rangel and Spaeth's 54 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/17/2018. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 9/20/2018. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
73
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Defendant J. Akanno's 53 Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/15/2018. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 9/20/2018. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER DENYING 51 Plaintiff's Motion to Extract Testimony of Defendants signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/2/2018. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER granting Motion for Extension of Time to comply with the Court's 9/27/2017 Order and respond to Defendants' Discovery Requests re 49 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/17/2017. (Filing Deadline: 11/20/2017). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER Regarding Defendants' 42 Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/27/2017. Thirty Day Deadline. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT Plaintiff's 46 Motion for Entry of Default as to Defendant Dr. Akanno, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/21/17. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER EXTENDING 26 Discovery and Scheduling Order Issued May 18, 2017, to Defendant J. Akanno signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/7/2017. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER DENYING 40 Plaintiff's Motion in Opposition to Declaration Filed by Deputy Attorney General, Catherine Woodbridge signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/10/2017. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER DIRECTING Defendant Dr. Akanno to File a Response to the Complaint Within Thirty (30) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/8/2017. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default 37 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/7/17. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 35 Motion for Copies of Inmate Appeals and DISCHARGING 33 Order to Show Cause, Issued July 24, 2017 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/1/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER as to Why Entry of Default Should Not Be Entered as to Defendant Akanno 16 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/21/17: 30-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Extending Discovery and Scheduling Order to Defendant Ogun Omolade re 26 , 28 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/9/17. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Defendant Ogun Omolade Should Not be Dismissed Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/24/17. Show Cause Response Due Within Thirty Days. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER denying 4 Motion for Preliminary Injunction signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/29/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DENYING Motion for Appointment of Counsel Without Prejudice 3 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/26/16. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
