Cases 1 - 10 of 1,514
Arias et al v. Electrical Millsgut Enterprise LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Jesus Arias, Jose Johanny Velazco, Jhonny Antonio Rangel Contreras and others
Defendant:
Electrical Millsgut Enterprise LLC and Sergio Millan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
United States of America v. Best (Cox)
as 24-1188
Defendant:
WALLACE BEST, JEFFREY THOMAS, OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bernardino v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-2536
Plaintiff:
CLAUDIO BERNARDINO, JR.
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR RALPH DIAZ, Warden TAMMY FOSS, THOMAS, (Captain) and others
Rangel-Gutierrez v. USA
as 5:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Raul Rangel-Gutierrez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rangel v. MOMENTUM SOLAR, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv14108
Plaintiff:
Joel Rangel
Defendant:
Dividend Finance Inc. and Momentum Solar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
v. Rangel Gonzales et al
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Luis F. Amaral Rangel v. Jaguar Land Rover North America LLC
as 2:2024cv02827
Plaintiff:
Luis F. Amaral Rangel
Defendant:
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
