Bernardino v. Diaz, et al.
| CLAUDIO BERNARDINO, JR. |
| Secretary of CDCR RALPH DIAZ, Warden TAMMY FOSS, THOMAS, (Captain), RANGEL, SVSP Correctional Officer, Captain, SANDOVAL, SVSP Correctional Officer, MORIN, SVSP Correctional Officer, THORPE, SVSP Correctional Officer, FREEMAN, SVSP Correctional Officer, VALLES, SVSP Correctional Officer, VILLANUEVA, CHAPIN, MONTE GRANDE, M.D. and EDUARDO DOMINGUES, M.D. |
| 24-2536 |
| April 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Hannah Park (added correct Hannah Park) [Entered: 04/24/2024 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Hannah Park representing Appellee Chapin, Appellee Eduardo Domingues, Appellee Morin, Appellee Sandoval, Appellee Thorpe, Appellee Villanueva. (added wrong Hannah Park) [Entered: 04/24/2024 03:50 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. A review of the district court docket reflects that appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court, and that such permission has not been revoked to date. Consequently, appellants forma pauperis status continues in this court. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), however, appellant must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal when funds are available in appellants account. Consequently, within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant must complete and file with this court the enclosed authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $605.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellants trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) and (e)(2). Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellants prison trust account total less than $10.00, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal may be dismissed by the Clerk. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will send a prisoner authorization form to appellant. [Entered: 04/24/2024 03:48 PM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 6/3/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 7/1/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/22/2024 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 5:21-cv-01629-EJD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-2536 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/22/2024 03:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
