Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Chapin v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2026cv00487
Petitioner:
Garrett Chapin
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Assured Testing Laboratories LLC, et al v. PerkinElmer Health Sciences, Inc., et al
as 26-1693
Plaintiff:
ASSURED TESTING LABORATORIES LLC, PLANT SAFE, LLC, EVIO, INC. and others
Defendant:
PERKINELMER HEALTH SCIENCES, INC., REVVITY HEALTH SCIENCES, INC., PERKINELMER U.S. LLC and others
Wolfe et al v. Porras et al
as 3:2026cv04312
Plaintiff:
Bradley Allen Wolfe, L.G.W. and L.M.W.
Defendant:
Ralna Porras, Cori Chapin, Shari Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Puccio Jr et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04305
Plaintiff:
Anthony Puccio Jr, Xavier Char-Amato, Harold Blake Milton Jr. and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chapin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00139
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Chapin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
PEREZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2026cv01242
Defendant:
DC CHARTER SCHOOL ALLIANCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, WENDY KOPP and others
Plaintiff:
SHANIQUE PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Edwards Affordable Housing LLC v. Chapin et al
as 1:2026cv01121
Plaintiff:
Edwards Affordable Housing LLC
Defendant:
Mark Chapin, Mark (I) Chapin, Tom Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (d)(p) - Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
