Abreu v. Jaime et al
| Armando Abreu |
| G. Jaime, K. Hixon, Garza, P. Sanchez, W. J. Sullivan, T. Lee and M. Voong |
| 1:2016cv00715 |
| May 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER Regarding In Forma Pauperis Status on Appeal signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 06/04/2018. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Randomly Assign District Judge to this Action; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Fourteen (14) Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/29/2017. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. Objections to F&R due by 12/18/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why this Action Should not be Dismissed for Failure to State a Claim, Failure to Obey a Court Order, and Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 09/27/2017. Show Cause Response due by 10/23/2017.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Denying 22 Motion for Leave to Amend as Moot signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 06/20/2017. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Denying 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 06/30/2016. (Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
