Jones v. Sherman et al
| William Jones |
| Stuart Sherman, D. Romeo, G. Martinez and C.D.C.R. |
| 1:2016cv01378 |
| September 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of This Action, With Prejudice, for Failure to State a Claim, Failure to Obey a Court Order, and Failure to Prosecute 14 , 16 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/29/17: 14-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim, failure to obey a Court Order, and Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 08/2/17. Show Cause Response due (14-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 8 Plaintiff's Request for Emergency Injunctive Relief be DENIED signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/20/2017. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/3/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
