Buckley, Jr. v. Johnson et al
| Rodney C. Buckley, Jr. |
| B. Johnson, R. Zamora, A. Rocha, J. Gonzales, A. Scaife and Guiterrez |
| 1:2017cv00102 |
| January 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER Regarding Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/6/2019. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER & WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to Transport Plaintiff Rodney C. Buckley, Jr., CDCR #AA-9358, to Settlement Conference on October 17, 2019 at 9:00 a.m., signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 09/19/2019. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/13/2019 setting Settlement Conference for 10/17/2019 at 09:30 AM at U.S. District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 in Courtroom 1 before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
66
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 35 , DENIED without prejudice to renewal as a Motion for Summary Judgment ; referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/3/19. Objections to F&R due 14-Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER for Substitution of Attorney 57 ; ORDER VACATING Telephonic Status Conference set for February 13, 2019; ORDER Setting Deadline to Respond to First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/29/2019. (21-Day Deadline)(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER Setting Hearing on 38 MOTION to WITHDRAW as COUNSEL for Defendant Zamora, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/21/18. Motion Hearing set for 1/16/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER & Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum to transport inmate, Rodney C. Buckley, CDCR No. AA-9358 for a Settlement Conference on 11/1/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney at the U.S. District Court 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/9/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER discharging Order to Show Cause why Doe Defendants should not be dismissed 25 and requiring Plaintiff to substitute Doe Defendant or file status report within 45-days signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/5/2018.(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER DIRECTING Plaintiff to Provide Written Notice Identifying Doe Defendant for Service of Process or SHOW CAUSE Why Doe Defendant should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute; Twenty-One (21) Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/10/2018. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER adopting 16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding dismissal of certain claims and defendants signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/30/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
16
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Regarding Cognizable Claims and Dismissal of Certain Claims and Defendants re 14 First Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/4/2018. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
