Cases 1 - 10 of 1,475
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rocha v. Kroger Texas, LP
as 3:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Rocha
Defendant:
Kroger Texas, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
(PC) Rocha v. Monroe, et al.
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Randy Joe Rocha
Defendant:
Atlee M Monroe, James Fontento, M Kieu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gideons v. Rocha et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Alan Richard Gideons
Defendant:
Rudy Rocha and SF Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Tyron Dyeralle Davis
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueda v Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cesar Rueda
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
