S.B., et al v. California Department of Education, et al.
S. B., Kristina B. and Michael B. |
California Department of Education and The State of California |
1:2017cv01507 |
November 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Barbara A. McAuliffe |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Civil Rights: Education |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER to Recaption Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/9/19. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 57 ORDER for Substitution of Attorneys, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/7/19. Julia R. Jackson, as lead counsel along with Kate Starn Legrand, as counsel for defendant Tony Thurmond. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 53 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/13/2018. (Valdez, E) |
Filing 44 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS, 25 & 28 . State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Agency Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part. Plaintiffs' sixth cause of action agains t all defendants for declaratory relief is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment. Plaintiffs' IDEA, RA, and ADA claims are dismissed against CDE and the State for failure to exhau st under IDEA. Plaintiffs' Section 1983 claim against Brown is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the Eleventh Amendment. Agency Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Section 1983 Claim against Torlakson is DENIED. Order signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/27/2018. (Timken, A) |
Filing 43 ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/23/2018. The scheduling conference currently set for 8/16/2018 is CONTINUED to 9/27/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The parties may appear at the scheduling conference by telephone with each party using the following dial-in number and passcode: dial-in number 1-877-411-9748; passcode 319086. (Thorp, J) |
Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS FAC AND MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 20, 2018. MOTIONS to DISMISS 25 28 set for 6/28/2018 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/16/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Munoz, I) |
Filing 24 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on March 26, 2018. (Munoz, I) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE ANSWER AND TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Scheduling Conference currently set for 5/17/2018 is moved to 6/28/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/6/2018. (Kusamura, W) |
Filing 9 ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND CONTINUING MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Scheduling Conference set for 2/8/2018 is CONTINUED to 5/17/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/4/2018. (Thorp, J) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting 4 Petition for Guardians Ad Litem signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/15/2017. (Lundstrom, T) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.