Patterson v. Sullivan

Petitioner: Vester L. Patterson
Respondent: William J. Sullivan
Case Number: 1:2018cv00038
Filed: January 8, 2018
Court: California Eastern District Court
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Referring Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 12, 2018 10 Opinion or Order of the Court FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the Habeas Corpus Petition be Summarily Dismissed with Prejudice for Failure to State a Claim and for Failure to Exhaust State Remedies re 9 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Vester L. Patterson ; referred to Judge Drozd, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 03/12/2018. Objections to F&R due by 4/5/2018 (Martin-Gill, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patterson v. Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Vester L. Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William J. Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?