Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Patterson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County et al
as 4:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
Vester L. Patterson
Defendant:
Superior Court of Los Angeles County and Los Angeles County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Andes
as 5:2024cv01292
Petitioner:
Vester L. Patterson
Respondent:
Warden Chance Andes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Patterson v. HIP-C Committee, et al.
as 1:2019cv01401
Defendant:
HIP-C Committe, California Correctional Health Care Services and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)
Plaintiff:
Vester L. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Patterson v. Sherman
as 1:2018cv01688
Petitioner:
Vester L. Patterson
Respondent:
Stu Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vester Patterson v. USDC-CAFR
as 18-72435
:
In re: VESTER L. PATTERSON
Petitioner:
VESTER L. PATTERSON, AKA Vestor Lee Patterson
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01202
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Vester Patterson v. CDCR, et al
as 18-16512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VESTER L. PATTERSON, AKA Vestor Lee Patterson
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES
Vester Patterson v. William Sullivan
as 18-16313
Petitioner - Appellant:
VESTER L. PATTERSON, AKA Vestor Lee Patterson
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN
Vester Patterson v. William Sullivan
as 18-55902
Petitioner - Appellant:
VESTER L. PATTERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN
Vester Patterson v. Sam Do, et al
as 18-16233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VESTER L. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SAM WONG DO, N. HASHEMI, J. CLARK KELSO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
