(PC) Moultrie v. Haynes et al
| Andre Lafon Moultrie |
| Haynes, Ventura and Chavez |
| 1:2018cv01555 |
| November 13, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Law Library Access by Andre Lafon Moultrie. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Andre Lafon Moultrie.(Flores, E) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Andre Lafon Moultrie. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/15/2018. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Sant Agata, S)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Andre Lafon Moultrie. (Sant Agata, S) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 12/17/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Marrujo, C) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint served on Andre Lafon Moultrie. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Andre Lafon Moultrie. (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Andre Lafon Moultrie.(Marrujo, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
