Cases 1 - 10 of 5,594
Brown v. Anderson, et al.
as 25-4133
Plaintiff:
GREGORY TYREE BROWN
Defendant:
TERRY ANDERSON, in their individual and official capacities, DALE CALDWELL, in their individual and official capacities, DONALD DUNCAN and others
(PC) Tale v. Manson et al
as 2:2025cv01874
Plaintiff:
Melvin Tale
Defendant:
M. Manson, M. Hayne and M. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYNES v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv00907
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY HAYNES
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anaya v. Hudson et al
as 5:2025cv03122
Plaintiff:
Justin Anaya
Defendant:
(fnu) Hudson, John Doe 1-42, (fnu) Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Haynes et al v. Dougherty et al
as 1:2025cv00804
Plaintiff:
Veronica Adele Haynes and Saniyah Sabri Henderson
Defendant:
Officer James Dougherty and Town of Smyrna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Felissa Grissett v. Haynes Bridge Dental Care
as 25-12210
Plaintiff:
FELISSA GRISSETT
Defendant:
HAYNES BRIDGE DENTAL CARE
Haynes v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2025cv02964
Plaintiff:
Edwin Haynes
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. dba Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006-WF2 and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Grissett v. Haynes Bridge Dental Care
as 1:2025cv03561
Plaintiff:
Felissa Grissett
Defendant:
Haynes Bridge Dental Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAYNES v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2025cv03214
Plaintiff:
LADEANNA HAYNES
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haynes v. Big M LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00657
Plaintiff:
Hunter Haynes
Defendant:
Big M LLC and Elijah Paul Marco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
