Cases 1 - 10 of 95
CUMMINGS v. BIRDSEYE et al
as 1:2023cv00980
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID CUMMINGS
Defendant:
SARAH BIRDSEYE, SARA ANDERSON, AJ BUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Jeremy Lamond Henderson Trust v. Haynes
as 3:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lamond Henderson Trust
Defendant:
Brad Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haynes et al v. Rocky Mount Cycles, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Kimberly J Haynes and James Edmond Cheeley
Defendant:
Rocky Mount Cycles, Inc., MS Family Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Bayside Harley-Davidson, Slaughter, Inc. d/b/a Bayside Harley-Davidson (Portsmith CI) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Haynes v. Advance Auto Parts, Incorporated
as 5:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Kara Haynes
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jeremy Lamond Henderson Trust v. Haynes
as 3:2023cv00583
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lamond Henderson Trust
Defendant:
Brad Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAYNES v. USA
as 1:2023cv00495
Petitioner:
JEFFREY DEMETRIUS HAYNES
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Haynes v. Anderson et al
as 5:2023ct03125
Plaintiff:
Robert Jeremy Haynes
Defendant:
Officer M. Anderson and Officer Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Carothers Holding Company,LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Hubert Simpson, Lynda Mason, Allison Montgomery and others
Defendant:
Carothers Holding Company, LLC, StoneMor GP, LLC, StoneMor North Carolina, LLC and others
Haynes v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00764
Plaintiff:
Stanley Haynes
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Haynes v. Richards et al
as 5:2023ct03059
Plaintiff:
Robert Jeremy Haynes
Defendant:
Officer Richards and Sgt. Deas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
