(PC) Popovich v. Igbinosa et al
Frank Joseph Popovich |
Mary Grace Patolinghug, Ngozi Igbinosa, Raul Bravo, Maricrus Sagisi, Afron Alphonse, North Kern State Prison, Vejay Patel, Ndakwe Odeluga, Dora Espinoza, M. Ortiz, CDCR, Abraham Nisim, Alexander Austria, Calvin William, Kelly Santora, P. Rodriguez, State of California, Jesus Angulo, Antoinette Sob, Melissa Walker and Carlos Lopez |
1:2019cv01758 |
December 14, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Gary S Austin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER DENYING #8 , #9 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 01/02/2020. (Orozco, A) |
Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 1/2/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application -Prisoner) (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Frank Joseph Popovich. (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #12 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, served on Frank Joseph Popovich. (Orozco, A) |
Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 9 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Frank Joseph Popovich. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 8 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Frank Joseph Popovich. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 7 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Frank Joseph Popovich. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 6 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/21/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Yin, K) |
Filing 5 ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:19-cv-2490 DB PC) to Fresno (1:19-cv-1758 GSA PC) signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 12/17/2019; this court has not ruled on plaintiff's request to proceed ifp. (Yin, K) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #5 Transfer Order served on Frank Joseph Popovich. (Yin, K) |
Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *12/14/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 1/21/2020 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Reader, L) |
Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Frank Joseph Popovich, CDC BG-6516 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (TEXT ONLY) (Plummer, M) |
SERVICE BY EMAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Frank Joseph Popovich. (Reader, L) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Frank Joseph Popovich. (Reader, L) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Defendants by Frank Joseph Popovich. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reader, L) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.