Cases 1 - 10 of 298
Collective Edge, LLC v. US
as 24-2095
Plaintiff:
COLLECTIVE EDGE, LLC, CARLOS LOPEZ, JR., COLLEEN A. LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Mack Wells, et al v. U.S. Bank, National Association, et al
as 24-12181
Defendant:
HOMECOMINGS FINANCIAL, LLC, JOHN C. SCHLESINGER, HARVEY RUVIN and others
Plaintiff:
MAURICE SYMONETTE and MACK WELLS
Sanchez et al v. Schneider National Carriers Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lopez Sanchez and Edith Nava Gomez
Defendant:
Schneider National Carriers, Inc., Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. d/b/a Ryder Truck Rental, LLC, AMWAP Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Upstream Holdings, LLC v. Brekunitch
as 24-1924
Plaintiff:
UPSTREAM HOLDINGS, LLC
Counter Defendant:
MIDWAY METALS LLC, CONTRACTOR METALS, LLC, ERIC BACHMAN and others
Defendant:
M AND M MACHINERY, DOES, 1-7, MARTIN LOPEZ, SR. and others
Lizarraga, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
as 24-3463
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LIZARRAGA, CARLOS DADA, SERGIO ARAUZ and others
Defendant:
NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
United States of America v. Rodriguez Tapia
as 24-1245
Defendant:
ALEX SANTIAGO RODRIGUEZ TAPIA, NERLYN LUIS BAQUE VILLAFUERTE, JUAN CARLOS LOPEZ LASA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dada, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
as 24-2179
Plaintiff:
CARLOS DADA, SERGIO ARAUZ, GABRIELA CACERES GUTIERREZ and others
Defendant:
NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
USA v. Carlos Lopez, Sr.
as 24-1356
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CARLOS LOPEZ, SR.
Lopez v. Garland
as 24-1105
Petitioner:
CARLOS LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Soto III v. Servicio de Cruces Excell et al
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Fernando Soto III
Defendant:
Servicio de Cruces Excell and Carlos Lopez Serna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
