(PC) Montecastro v. Newsom et al
| Hendrix M. Montecastro |
| Ralph M. Diaz and Gavin Newsom |
| 1:2020cv00689 |
| May 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/18/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Jessen, A)
|
| Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: Plaintiff's Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Jessen, A) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER SEVERING PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS and Directing the Clerk of Court to Open a New Prisoner Civil Rights Action for Plaintiff Hendrix Moreno Montecastro signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/15/2020. (Jessen, A)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Hendrix M. Montecastro. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Ralph M. Diaz, Gavin Newsom by Hendrix M. Montecastro. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet). (Jessen, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Hendrix M. Montecastro. (Jessen, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider, #3 Order served on Hendrix M. Montecastro. (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
