(PC) Williams v. CDCR Medical et al
Kyle Williams |
Nugyn and CDCR Medical |
1:2020cv00807 |
June 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Jennifer L Thurston |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SECOND ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/27/2020. Consent or Decline due within 30 days. (Rivera, O) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order Re Consent or Request for Reassignment served on Kyle Williams. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 4 ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Pay Filing Fee signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 06/13/2020. Motion for IFP due within Forty-Five Days. (Attachments: #1 In Forma Pauperis)(Flores, E) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order served on Kyle Williams. (Flores, E) |
Filing 3 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on CCI. (Flores, E) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *6/10/2020*; Consent or Decline due by 7/16/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Flores, E) |
Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against CDCR Medical, Nugyn by Kyle Williams.(Flores, E) #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Flores, E). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.