Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Blanton v. CDCR Medical et al
as 3:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Derrik Blanton
Defendant:
CDCR Medical, Appeal Office, Attorneys Enabling Torture and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo v. McVay et al
as 3:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Mona S. Murillo
Defendant:
CDCR, M. McVay, CDCR Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert F. Baker, Jr. v. James S. Hill
as 5:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
James S. Hill, Daniel Cuevas, City of Corona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Robert Cole, Jr. v. K. Allison, et al
as 23-15149
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT LEE COLE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
K. ALLISON, Director of the Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of the Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, RON DAVIS, Associate Director of Reception Centers (ADRC) of CDCR and others
Blacksher v. Trump et al
as 3:2021cv00442
Defendant:
Law Enforcement, Gavin Newsome, All CDCR & Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Blacksher, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Voage v. Dr. Shpaner et al
as 3:2021cv00420
Defendant:
Dr. Reddy, Dr. J. Silva, Dr. Soumekh and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Voage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Page v. CDCR Medical
as 1:2020cv00917
Defendant:
CDCR Medical
Plaintiff:
Patti M. Page
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Williams v. CDCR Medical et al
as 1:2020cv00807
Defendant:
Nugyn and CDCR Medical
Plaintiff:
Kyle Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Montenegro v. CDCR-Medical
as 1:2019cv01440
Defendant:
CDCR-Medical
Plaintiff:
Juan Montenegro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Quair v. Warden et al
as 3:2019cv01270
Defendant:
United States Post Master, Appeals Coordinator, CDCR Medical and Dental Departments and others
Plaintiff:
David Sabino Quair, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
