(PC) Arrant v. Santoro et al
| Melvin R. Arrant |
| U. Valencia, O. Herrera, E. Garcia, A. Flores, A. Padillas, Kelly Santoro, P. Chanelo, J. Valdez, Lozano and D. Ceballos |
| 1:2020cv01253 |
| September 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
SCREENING ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Leave to File an Amended Complaint or Notify the Court of Intent to Proceed on Claims found to be cognizable,signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/29/2020 (First Amended Complaint or Notice to the Court due within 30-Day Deadline) (Attachments: #1 Amended PC Complaint Form)(Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Screening Order, served on Melvin R. Arrant. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that #2 Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and/or Temporary Restraining Order be DENIED re #2 #1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/28/2020. Referred to Judge Drozd. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Findings and Recommendations served on Melvin R. Arrant. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Proceed IFP, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Melvin R. Arrant. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Melvin R. Arrant. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd and Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. The new case number is: 1:20-cv-01253-DAD-SAB-(PC). (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Melvin R. Arrant. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER to Submit Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis OR Pay Filing Fee Within 45 Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/8/2020. ( Motion for IFP due within FORTY-FIVE days.) (Attachments: #1 IFP App & Instructions)(Marrujo, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order, served on Melvin R. Arrant. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 4
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Marrujo, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Melvin R. Arrant. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Melvin R. Arrant. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION & MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, by Melvin R. Arrant. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing 1
(1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against D. Ceballos, P. Chanelo, A. Flores, E. Garcia, O. Herrera, Lozano, A. Padillas, Kelly Santoro, J. Valdez, U. Valencia by Melvin R. Arrant.(Marrujo, C)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
