Cases 1 - 10 of 1,959
(HC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Petitioner:
Shakazulu Sigidi KasenzangaKhona
Respondent:
L. Cano, Lozano, De La Torree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv50101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Stapleton v. Lozano
as 24-40155
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Louise Stapleton and Dawn Stapleton, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joshua Stapleton
Defendant:
Ernesto Lozano, Justin Lee Becerra and Cesar Solis
Garcia et al v. Laundry OPS, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02030
Plaintiff:
Amalia Garcia and Victor Lozano
Defendant:
Laundry OPS, LLC, Laundry Growth Holdings, LLC, Paul Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Diaz Gutierrez et al v. Frederick et al
as 2:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Jorge Diaz Gutierrez, Jorge Ruiz Perez, Sandi Diaz Lozano and others
Defendant:
James Joseph Frederick and Laboratory Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Brizuela et al v. Steel Standing LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Brizuela, Miguel A. Mayorga and Jimmy Lozano
Defendant:
Steel Standing LLC, Riviera Roofing, LLC, Michael J. Ladouceur and others
Mercado-Lozano v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Ricardo Mercado-Lozano and Heriberto Diaz-Lozano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lozano v. Transportes de Anda SA de CV
as 7:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Fernando Fabian Lozano
Defendant:
Transportes de Anda SA de CV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
