Cases 1 - 10 of 501
Lozano v. Longs Drug Stores California, LLC
as 5:2024cv02453
Plaintiff:
Jhon Pompilio Lozano
Defendant:
Longs Drug Stores California, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
(HC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Petitioner:
Shakazulu Sigidi KasenzangaKhona
Respondent:
L. Cano, Lozano, De La Torree and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 055
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00701
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
In Re: JC Cogito Ergo Sum Express Trust
as 8:2024mc00001
Not Yet Classified:
JC Cogito Ergo Sum Express Trust
Petitioner:
Trust Protector Harol Lozano
(PS) McGee v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jefferson A. McGee
Defendant:
State of California, The Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lozano v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2023cv05769
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO CRUZ LOZANO
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Timothy D. Wilkins v. E. Lozano et al
as 2:2023cv09163
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Wilkins
Defendant:
E. Lozano, M. Benetes, Santiago Olmos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deana Lozano v. Sports Research Corporation
as 2:2023cv08696
Plaintiff:
Deana Lozano
Defendant:
Sports Research Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brandon Faye et al v. Real Ketones LLC
as 2:2023cv08695
Plaintiff:
Deana Lozano and Brandon Faye
Defendant:
Real Ketones LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
