(HC) Garner v. Cates
| Mark Erwin Garner |
| W. J. Sullivan and Brian Cates |
| 1:2020cv01403 |
| October 2, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #9 Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/24/2020. Response to Petition due within sixty (60) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER Construing Motion for Extension of Time in Part as Motion to Amend to Name Proper Respondent; ORDER Granting Motion to Amend; and ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Change Name of Respondent signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/24/2020. Brian Cates added in place of W.J. Sullivan. (Jessen, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order, #11 Order on Motion for Extension served on Mark Erwin Garner. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for 60-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME to file Respondent's Response to Petitioner's petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by W. J. Sullivan. (Desai, Nirav)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to UnassignedDJ and Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. The new case number is: 1:20-cv-1403 NONE-JLT (HC). (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Mark Erwin Garner. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 7
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Desai, Nirav)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT for Respondent, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/8/2020. Consent or Decline due by 11/12/2020 (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 4
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Tami Krenzin. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/7/2020. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. Consent or Decline due by 12/10/2020 (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition, served on Mark Erwin Garner. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Petitioner's Consent or Decline due by 11/9/2020. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Maldonado, C)
|
|
RECEIPT number #CAE100046662 $5.00 fbo Mark Garner BC9796 by State of California on 10/5/2020. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Mark Erwin Garner. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 1
(2254) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against W. J. Sullivan by Mark Erwin Garner.(Maldonado, C)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
