(PC) Rodriguez v. Newsom et al
| Pedro Rodriguez |
| Fisher, Ralph Diaz and Gavin Newsom |
| 1:2020cv01792 |
| December 21, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Gary S Austin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/22/2020. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Maldonado, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Pedro Rodriguez. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Plaintiff's Consent or Decline due by 1/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Pedro Rodriguez. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 1
(1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Ralph Diaz, Fisher, Gavin Newsom by Pedro Rodriguez.(Maldonado, C)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Pedro Rodriguez. (Maldonado, C)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
