(PC) Richardson v. Allison et al
| Asali M. Richardson |
| M. Pallares, Mitchell, Allison, Dotson and De La Cruz |
| 1:2021cv00070 |
| January 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why Plaintiff's #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Should not be Denied signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 03/03/2021. Show Cause Response due within Twenty-One. (Flores, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order to Show Cause served on Asali M. Richardson. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 4
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on CCWF. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *1/19/2021*;Plaintiff's Consent or Decline due by 2/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Asali M. Richardson. (Maldonado, C)
|
|
Filing 1
(1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Allison, De La Cruz, Dotson, Mitchell, M. Pallares by Asali M. Richardson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maldonado, C)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
