(PC) Samaniego v. CDCR et al
| Ivan Samaniego |
| F. Zavaleta, California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, W. J. Sullivan, F. Perez, C. Castillo, Beardsley, K. Mumby, J. Lugue, Christian Pfeffer, Gray and E. Weiss |
| 1:2021cv00839 |
| May 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 8/17/2021 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Attachments: #1 Worksheet, #2 Standing Order, #3 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #4 Consent Form, #5 VDRP) (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Beardsley, California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation, C. Castillo, Gray, J. Lugue, K. Mumby, F. Perez, Christian Pfeffer, W. J. Sullivan, E. Weiss, F. Zavaleta* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Brian D. McMahon* *Law Offices of Brian D. McMahon* *1575 Westwood Blvd., Suite 200* *Los Angeles, CA 90024*. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Ivan Samaniego. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9618372) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Interested Parties) (McMahon, Brian)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
