(HC) Bisel v. Fisher
Gregory Eugene Bisel |
Ray Fisher, Jr. |
1:2021cv01071 |
July 9, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Helena M Barch-Kuchta |
Anthony W Ishii |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Chen, Joanne) |
Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Anthony W. Ishii and Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta. The new case number is: 1:21-cv-01071 AWI-HBK (HC). (Martin-Gill, S) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 8 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Gregory Eugene Bisel. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 6 DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus served on Attorney General's Office. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 5 ORDER RE CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 7/14/2021. Respondent's Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 4 ORDER Requiring Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Setting Briefing Schedule, and Directing Service of Petition signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 7/13/2021. (Jessen, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order Directing Respondent to File a Response to the Petition served on Gregory Eugene Bisel. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 3 ORDER AUTHORIZING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS as to Gregory Eugene Bisel signed by Magistrate Judge Helena M. Barch-Kuchta on 7/12/2021. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 2 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED: Petitioner's Consent or Decline due within thirty (30) days. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Jessen, A) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order Authorizing IFP Status, #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Gregory Eugene Bisel. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 1 (2254) PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Ray Fisher, Jr by Gregory Eugene Bisel. (Jessen, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: (HC) Bisel v. Fisher | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Gregory Eugene Bisel | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Ray Fisher, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Joanne Chen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.