Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Fisher v. Dodge et al
as 2:2023cv01929
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ray Fisher, Jr.
Defendant:
Raymond Dodge and Russell E Woemmel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Scott
as 2:2023cv01241
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ray Fisher, Jr.
Defendant:
Leo Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fisher v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Leonard Ray Fisher, Jr.
Defendant:
Marwin Smith and Cindy Joseph Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory Bisel v. Ray Fisher, Jr., et al
as 23-15519
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY EUGENE BISEL
Respondent / Appellee:
RAY FISHER, Jr., Warden and SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations
(HC) Bisel v. Fisher
as 1:2021cv01071
Petitioner:
Gregory Eugene Bisel
Respondent:
Ray Fisher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jesse Allred v. CDCR, et al
as 19-16770
Defendant / Appellee:
M. DUROY, P. JOHNSON, M. MARTINEZ and others
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, J. CLARK KELSO, JEFFREY A. BEARD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE ALLRED
Bisel v. Kernan, et al.
as 1:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Gregory Eugene Bisel
Defendant:
Scott Kernan and Ray Fisher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bisel v. Fisher et al
as 1:2017cv00013
Petitioner:
Gregory Eugene Bisel
Respondent:
Ray Fisher, Jr. and Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bisel v. Fisher et al
as 2:2016cv02976
Petitioner:
Gregory Eugene Bisel
Respondent:
Ray Fisher, Jr. and Scott Kernan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Allred v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2016cv01571
Plaintiff:
Jesse D. Allred
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, California Correctional Health Car Services, Valley State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
